An Land buying agreement is done in favor of grandfather name. Later the seller has died and seller son’s are not ready to give property to my grandfather, My grandfather filed case though court. Later on after 5 years my grandfather died, After grandfather death, two sons and grander mother name are include to the case and was running, later on grandmother has expired, First son was attended court as per lawyers input whenever required, second son never attended the court even he has not paid court fee and lawyer charges, After 4 years the first son decided to compromised with seller son and took 2000 square feet’s out one acer. This 2000 square feet’s are registered in the favor of First son. And First son given a written document on 10 rs stamp without Registration saying I will be the responsible if any approaches for this case 123/2003.
Question is: First son got registered land 2000 square feet’s on his name but property has not come though court compromised outside court. In this case whether second son has right on the 2000 square feet’s which is given to First son.
Would like to know more about rule 28 of 3 setion and also rue 36
Asked 7 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
Thanks for your inputs.
Yes, the companies is happened between Seller son and First Son only. But First son given written notice on 10rs stamp which is not Registered, but written outside and to seller son saying if anybody comes on this case he also mentioned case number in that written notice which given to seller son.
Now Second son is coming even I have right on 2000 squarefeets and gave lawyer notice, but second son never attended to the court and second son never sspent singel ruppe for this case. hence First son compramised outside.
Please let me know your suggestion on above situation
Asked 7 years ago