As per the general practice in the market, the developer, by the agreement of sale, sells only the ‘flat’ and the purchaser has rights in respect of only the flat and no other portion of the building. This is exactly what had been agreed to between the developer Nahalchand Laloochand Private Limited and the flat purchasers of Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.Each flat purchaser had executed a declaration to the effect that stilt parking spaces/open parking spaces shown in the plan exclusively belong to the promoter and that the Society has no objection to the sale of such spaces by it. However, this was later argued by the Society as being contrary to law and hence, not binding. When the dispute arose, the developer approached the Bombay Civil Court seeking “permanent injunction restraining the Society from encroaching upon, trespassing and/or in any manner disturbing, obstructing or interfering with its possession in respect of 25 parking spaces in the stilt portion of the building”.
Common areas as per law includes basements, gardens, cellars, parking areas, main walls, terraces, halls, stairways, corridors, entrances, exits and lobbies, and the entire space of land used during construction under the definition of common areas in an apartment complex.
Under Section 78 of MOFA Act, The allotment of parking space/ stilts shall be made by the committee on the basis of ‘first come first served’, for unsold and available parking spaces. However, in case of Parking Space/ stilt allotted by the society, the member shall have no right to sell or transfer the said allotted parking space/ stilt to anybody.
In the present times, almost every apartment has an open or a covered car park. Certain apartments may have more than one. Hence, in matters where some of the apartments were not allotted car park or where an extra car park is allotted to the owners of certain apartments only, such car park has to be treated as part of "limited common areas and facilities". Limited common areas and facilities means such of those common areas and facilities designated for the use of certain specified apartments only.
The court observed that the common areas of the society were meant for use by all members of the society and could not be appropriated, even temporarily, by any person for the purpose of parking their additional vehicles. The court also observed that circulation space including pathways in the society had to be kept free and vacant at all times for security reasons and to ensure access to emergency vehicles including fire tenders, ambulances and police vehicles. Therefore, the court held that the petitioner had no right to park any vehicle in the common areas.
Based on the above observations, the court dismissed the petition and directed the petitioner to pay costs. This judgment passed by the Delhi High Court clarifies that members in a society cannot park their cars at unauthorised places or common areas. The members can park their cars only at the parking place designated by the society.
From the above it can be seen that the society by a resolution in the meeting can take such actions.