Do you mean this even when the Trail Court has pronounced the final verdict(Dismissed) in my case, I wanted to know if you are meaning the CMP for the IA of the additional evidence that was dismissed or against the Main HMOP petition that is dismissed
A revision will lie on the IA that has been dismissed during the pendency of the main petition and not after the dismissal of main petition. While the main case has been disposed all the petitions pending in the main case stands disposed, in fact a decision on the pending IAs should have been made by the court before disposal of main case.
You have stated "Probably you may not get justice in the final argument too." I have lost the HMOP petition in the trial court already so this statement of yours gives me the feel that you have not got my situation completely correct, please confirm, When we have got our HMOP petition dismissed while the Judge has rejected our very Crucial evidences through our additional evidence IA's whether we can
1 > Go to HC for CMP or CRP under article 226? or An Appeal to District court ?
By the above I was referring to the decisions on IAs only and not in the main petition.
See, it is your fault for not furnishing proper details. Now only you state that the HMOP was dismissed and you have not stated about the dismissal of the main OP anywhere in your previous questions.
If you give improper details, you will get improper opinions only.
Well, now since your main case stands dismissed, you have no other choice than to prefer an appeal against this judgment before the first appellate court.
If your visitation rights have been denied, then you may file a petition under GWOP with an IA for visitation rights as interim relief.
Approaching high court with a writ petition on this may not fetch you any desired relief.
The next step to be taken by you is to go for an appeal against the judgment in HMOP.
You have said that my only remedy is to file an appeal against the impugned order, this view is quite contrary with view of Mr.Kalaiselvan(my intention of asking this question is to get a right path for me moving forward and not to build a contradiction between you two), in my situation my Trial court is a SubCourt so next for appeal i need to move on to a district court, but is it possible to move to HC under article 226 for my situation ?
Please note that there is no contradiction in the opinion of both lawyers.
The confusion in opinions is due to the incomplete information furnished by you.
Well you can prefer an appeal before district court only and you do not have remedy under article 226 before high court.