Please meet a good advocate. Writing here will not help you much. 

Only an advocate after scrtrunising relevant papers can guide you properly. 

There are multiple cases against you and by you pending at various courts/ police and the background details of each case is not known. 

Since you await the disposal it would be better that you wait for the disposal because any opinion rendered without knowing the proper details would be a misguidance. 

You may clarify further details from your own advocate. 

You can file SLP in SC against HC order of dismissal of your case 

To expedite an ongoing trial, the proper legal step is to approach the High Court under Section 529 BNSS(corresponding to old Section 483 CrPC). This provision empowers the High Court to exercise general superintendence over lower courts, allowing it to issue direct guidelines or orders to conclude a case expeditiously.

Both Section 182 and Section 211 IPC are non-cognizable offences. By law, police officers cannot register an FIR or initiate an investigation for non-cognizable offences without direct authorization from a Magistrate.

 If your application/complaint under Section 223 BNSS  gets dismissed by the Magistrate, do not panic. Dismissal at this initial stage is not an acquittal of the accused—it is a judicial order that can be challenged and overturned by higher courts.

File a Criminal Revision Application before  Sessions Court OR Calcutta High Court under Section 438/442 BNSS. The Higher Court can set aside the dismissal order and direct the Magistrate to take cognisance or conduct a proper inquiry on merits in your revision petition. 

The police cannot directly file an FIR or a chargesheet against you under Section 182 or Section 211 of the IPC (now Section 217 and Section 248 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, BNS).These offences are non-cognizable. The police do not have the legal authority to register an FIR against you or file a standard police chargesheet for these allegations.

The police simply marking your assault complaint as "false" or "unsubstantiated" in a General Diary Entry (GDE) does not give them the automatic legal right to prosecute you for a false charge.

When you are fighting multiple legal battles at once, it can feel like every door is closing but in the Indian legal system, "everything failing" at the local level is precisely why higher oversight mechanisms exist.

You are not out of options. If the local police and lower courts fail to give you a fair hearing you can  file a petition under Section 528 BNSS (Section 482 CrPC) or a Writ of Mandamus before the Calcutta High Court seeking a transfer of the investigation from local police to an independent agency like the State CID or CBI. High Courts and the Supreme Court frequently transfer investigations away from local police stations when there is demonstrable police bias, retaliatory FIRs, or suppression of evidence.

Police officers do not enjoy absolute immunity when they abuse their authority to fabricate charges or assault citizens.File a detailed sworn affidavit directly to the Registrar (Law) of the NHRC, providing proof that the local police deliberately flouted the NHRC's explicit directive to associate you during the inquiry.

From the facts stated by you, it appears that multiple proceedings are already pending, including anticipatory bail, a quashing petition before the High Court, an application for stay of the criminal proceedings, an NHRC complaint, a complaint case under Section 223 BNSS (earlier Section 200 CrPC), and representations before senior police officers. At this stage, your focus should be on pursuing these remedies systematically rather than initiating multiple parallel proceedings.

Since no charge sheet has been filed till date, you should continue to press your quashing petition and the stay application before the High Court. You may also seek an early hearing if the investigation is being prolonged without justification.

As regards the General Diary Entry (GDE), it is not conclusive proof of the facts recorded therein. If the police have falsely closed your complaint through a GDE without a fair enquiry, you can challenge that action by placing the relevant facts before the Magistrate in your complaint case or, where appropriate, before the High Court. The GDE itself does not bar the Magistrate from independently appreciating the evidence.

If the police file an adverse enquiry report in your Section 223 BNSS complaint, the Magistrate is not bound to accept the police version. The Magistrate may independently examine the complainant and witnesses and decide whether sufficient grounds exist to proceed. Therefore, an adverse police report does not automatically result in dismissal.

If your complaint under Section 223 BNSS is dismissed, you may challenge the dismissal before the appropriate revisional court by filing a Criminal Revision Petition, depending upon the nature of the order and the provisions applicable in your case.

Regarding monitoring of the investigation, you may request appropriate directions from the Magistrate or rely upon the remedies available under the BNSS if the investigation is not being conducted fairly. Whether monitoring under the specific provision cited by you is maintainable will depend upon the stage of the proceedings and the facts of the case.

As regards your concern about proceedings under Section 182 IPC or Section 211 IPC (or their corresponding provisions under the new criminal laws), such action cannot be initiated merely because your complaint was not accepted. These provisions require satisfaction of the statutory ingredients and, in the case of Section 211 IPC, prosecution is ordinarily governed by the procedure prescribed under law. Merely pursuing legal remedies or filing complaints does not automatically expose you to prosecution under these provisions.

At this stage, the most practical course would be:

• pursue an early hearing of the quashing petition and stay application;
• contest any adverse investigation report with documentary evidence already available on record;
• continue the proceedings before the Magistrate under Section 223 BNSS;
• preserve all RTI replies, CCTV footage, call records, medical documents and other public records supporting your case.

Even if one remedy does not succeed, it does not mean all legal remedies are exhausted. Orders of the Magistrate, police authorities and investigative agencies are all subject to judicial scrutiny in accordance with law. It is therefore advisable to proceed strategically through the pending proceedings instead of initiating further parallel litigation unless necessitated by subsequent developments.