To answer your specific follow-up question, a 10-year lease does not make eviction materially more difficult than a 5-year lease if the tenant commits a clear breach of the lease terms, provided the lease is properly drafted.
If the tenant defaults in rent payment, unlawfully sublets the premises, changes the nature of use, causes substantial damage, violates municipal laws, carries out unauthorized construction, or breaches any material covenant of the lease, the landlord's right to terminate the lease and seek eviction arises from the breach itself, not from the duration of the lease. Therefore, whether the lease is for 5 years or 10 years, a properly drafted termination clause should permit you to determine the tenancy upon specified defaults and recover possession through legal proceedings if the tenant does not vacate voluntarily.
The real difference between a 5-year lease and a 10-year lease arises when the tenant is complying with all lease conditions. In that situation, a 10-year lease gives the tenant a much stronger contractual right to remain in possession for the entire agreed term. If you later decide that you want the premises back for personal reasons, redevelopment, sale, family use, or higher rent, you may not be able to terminate the lease prematurely unless the agreement expressly provides such a right. In that sense, a 10-year lease is significantly more restrictive from the landlord's perspective than a shorter-term arrangement.
Since the tenant proposes to invest ₹15–20 lakhs in renovations, it is understandable that they seek long-term security. However, if you proceed, I would strongly recommend that the lease contain detailed provisions regarding:
- Immediate termination for rent default beyond a specified period.
- Immediate termination for unauthorized subletting or assignment.
- Immediate termination for misuse of the premises or illegal activities.
- A clear lock-in structure, if any.
- Inspection rights for the landlord.
- Ownership of all improvements and fixtures upon termination.
- No tenancy rights beyond the contractual lease period.
- Restoration obligations at the time of vacating.
- Escalation clause and security deposit.
- Dispute resolution and jurisdiction clauses.
A separate concern in your case is title. You have stated that the property still stands in the name of your deceased father and mutation in favour of your mother has not yet been completed, although there is an unregistered Will bequeathing the property to her. While this may not necessarily prevent the grant of a tenancy, it is preferable to first regularize the title position or, at a minimum, ensure that all legal heirs acknowledge your mother's authority to let out the premises. This reduces the risk of future disputes with the tenant regarding ownership.
Regarding conversion of the second floor from residential to commercial use, that issue depends upon the applicable building bye-laws, zoning regulations, land-use permissions, and municipal rules applicable in Ghaziabad. Merely using a residential floor for commercial purposes without necessary approvals can expose both landlord and tenant to municipal action. Therefore, this should be verified with the local development authority and municipal authorities before permitting commercial use.
My practical recommendation would be that if you are considering a long-term arrangement, you may explore either:
- A 5-year registered lease with renewal options; or
- A 10-year registered lease with strong landlord-protective termination clauses.
If properly drafted, a 10-year lease will not prevent eviction for genuine breaches such as non-payment of rent or illegal subletting. The greater risk is that if the tenant performs all obligations faithfully, you may be contractually bound to honour the entire 10-year term. That is the aspect which requires careful consideration before signing.