• Promotion under the VH quota on the basis of a disability certificate that is now considered invalid

I was appointed as a Junior Assistant in 1995 under the compassionate appointment quota. In 1998, after due medical examination by the District Medical Board, I was issued a disability certificate showing Visual Handicap (VH) of 55%.
In 2015, I was promoted as Senior Assistant under the general quota. Subsequently, my department informed me that the manual disability certificate issued in 1998 was not being considered and directed me to obtain a SADAREM certificate. Accordingly, I appeared before the competent Medical Board and was issued a SADAREM certificate in 2018 showing 40% Visual Handicap.
Based on the said SADAREM certificate, I was promoted as Superintendent in December 2018 under the VH reservation quota. My promotion was approved, my services were regularized, and my probation was declared.
Recently, my department issued another memo stating that the SADAREM certificate issued in 2018 is also not valid and directed me to undergo a fresh assessment before the State Level Appellate Medical Authority. After examination, the Appellate Authority assessed my present visual disability at 30%.
Based on this latest assessment, my higher authorities are proposing to cancel my promotion to the post of Superintendent and revert me to the post of Senior Assistant, stating that I had obtained promotion under the VH quota on the basis of a disability certificate that is now considered invalid.
My questions are:
1.	Can a disability reassessment conducted years after promotion be applied retrospectively to cancel a promotion that was validly granted on the basis of a disability certificate issued by a competent authority at that time?
2.	When there is no allegation of fraud, misrepresentation, or submission of a fake certificate, can an employee be penalized for relying on certificates issued by Government Medical Boards?
3.	Does the subsequent reduction of disability percentage from 40% to 30% automatically invalidate the promotion granted in 2018?
4.	Is the department legally justified in reverting me after my promotion has already been implemented, regularized, and acted upon for several years?
5.	What legal remedies are available to challenge the proposed reversion order?
Kindly guide me on the legal position and the remedies available in this matter.
Asked 9 hours ago in Labour

Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

2 Answers

1) A reassessment of disability conducted years after a promotion cannot be applied retrospectively to invalidate a promotion that was validly granted. At the time of your promotion in December 2018, you held a validly issued SADAREM certificate showing 40% disability, which met the statutory criteria for the Visual Handicap (VH) quota.

 

2)you cannot be penalized for relying on certificates issued by competent Government Medical Boards. You acted in good faith by obtaining and submitting the certificates precisely as directed by your employer

 

3)The subsequent reduction of your disability from 40% to 30% by the Appellate Authority does not automatically invalidate your 2018 promotion. Service law generally protects promotions granted on the basis of eligibility criteria met at the relevant time, even if those circumstances change in the future

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
100495 Answers
8219 Consultations

1. Under Indian service jurisprudence, the department cannot penalize you for the natural progression or reassessment of a medical condition years after a valid promotion was granted.A disability reassessment conducted years later cannot be applied retrospectively to undo a promotion that was validly granted based on the rules and certificates in force at that time. Your promotion was lawful when made. A subsequent change in your medical status in 2026 cannot erase the legality of your status in 2018.

2. An employee cannot be penalized for relying on official government certificates.The Supreme Court ( in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih) has  held that if an employee receives a benefit without any fraud, misrepresentation, or trickery on their part, the state cannot suddenly withdraw that benefit or punish the employee later for the state's own administrative shifts. If the department now questions that board's validity, it is an administrative error on their part, and the employee cannot be made a scapegoat for the system's contradictions.

3. You may note that the Reduction from 40% to 30% Automatically Invalidate the Promotion. Progressive or fluctuating medical conditions (like visual impairment) can improve or deteriorate over time due to medical advancements, surgeries, or natural changes. A reduction in disability percentage only affects your future eligibility for benefits under the Persons with Disabilities (PwD) quota. It does not operate as a disqualification retrospectively.

4. The department is not legally justified by its act. Your promotion was not temporary or ad-hoc. It was implemented, your services were regularized, and your probation was successfully declared. Once an employee's probation is cleared and they are regularized, they acquire a vested right to that post. Reverting you after several years of satisfactory service on a technicality violates the principles of natural justice and the doctrine of settled rights.

5. If the department issues a formal Show Cause Notice (SCN) or an actual Reversion Order, you have strong grounds to challenge it immediately.  you may submit a representation  in detail. If the department rejects your representation or issues a reversion order, you must immediately approach the appropriate judicial forum, i.e., SAT or CAT and if no such tribunal exists for your department, you can file a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking relief and remedy. 

 

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
90698 Answers
2523 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer