Since you have Anticipatory Bail (AB) with a condition to meet the IO twice a week, compliance is your strongest shield.

Every time you visit the police station, take a photo in front of the station or use Google Maps Timeline to prove your presence. During your visits, try to hand over your evidence (CCTV footage, cash memos for the money you were carrying) via a formal letter. If the IO refuses, send it via Registered Post AD the same day. This creates a paper trail that the IO is "refusing to receive proofs," which is vital for your quashing petition.

The statements alone do not bar quashing if the FIR is demonstrably "maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive" . Do not delay the interim stay application. Highlight the proximity of dates: the incident on 24th Nov followed immediately after your RTI on 19th Nov. This "proximate link" is the strongest evidence of a retaliatory FIR.

File an interlocutory application in the High Court to bring the NHRC’s demand for a report into the court's knowledge. This puts pressure on the police, as they are now answerable. 

If the SP and local police are silent, you must move the Judiciary directly.

If you have CCTV evidence showing the assault on 24th Nov was different from the FIR's version, filing this is necessary. It isn't retaliation; it is your version of the truth.

Thus for now you may 

1. Comply with bail
2. File CRAN (stay application)
3. Submit written evidence every time (create record)
4. Strengthen NHRC complaint
5. Seek protection from SP

and don't file any defamation case or a private complaint  now or take any move for retaliation.

RTI is not the best first step here instead file a “Reminder / Non-compliance Petition” before the National Human Rights Commission. RTI can be filed in parallel, but NHRC follow-up is stronger.

If there is no FIR registered so far, in your writ petition before high court you can include direction to concerned police for registering FIR 

The Section 94 BNSS is no in your favor here. it is for police to issue notice for documents and not a  tool for accused to force IO, instead you can send a written representation to the IO about it with a copy to the SP or the  Commissioner of police

quashing is to be done only inexceptional circumstances 

2) install cctv cameras in your residence 

3) complain to cimmisioner of police against local police officers refusing to take on record your documents 

4)  Courts generally hold that an accused cannot compel the production of documents through the IO (Investigating Officer) at the pre-charge stage. Instead of trying to force the IO, you should preserve your evidence and prepare to present it during the discharge stage or at the time of framing of charges, where the court has a duty to consider relevant documents that could prevent a failure of justice

Dear client

Your current situation involves malicious prosecution (e.g., wrongfully accused) and police failure to act (i.e., the police "sanctioned" the action against you) and has also included abuse of process (e.g., filing charges without proper evidence). It’s important that you approach your situation strategically and not emotionally.

Legal steps in chronological order:

Quashing & Interim Stay:

Immediately file CRAN for stay of the investigation/ charge-sheet in the Calcutta HC (your best remedy), as you would have to file the appropriate writ.

Writ Petition (Article 226):

File/modify a writ in the Calcutta HC (or your jurisdiction) seeking:

1) Court-monitored investigation, or
2) Transferring investigation to the CID or other independent agency; and
3) Preventing the police and/or accused from harassing you.

4) Investigate prior complaints made by you.

Evidence Submission:

Pursuant to Section 94 BNSS, submit written representation with attached evidence to the IO (Investigating Officer) and send copys to the SP/DGP by way of registered mail or e-mail (for record).

Non-Registration of FIR:

File SI application under Section 156(3) CrPC (now BNSS equivalent) to the Magistrate to have an FIR registered (for your complaint).

Avoid Section 175 (3) or 223 BNSS at the present time: Your attorney is correct — these will look retaliatory while you're attempting to quash.

RTI:

Yes, you should file RTI for ATR, NHRC report status, and irregularities in case diary.

Protection:

Bring an application for police protection due to threats made against your safety.

Defamation/Civil Suit Against the Police/CID for Malicious Prosecution:

File civil suit after quashing to enhance your chance of success in civil suit.

if you have any query  please feel free to conatct us 

Yes file an RTI application