Q. The property is located in Thane district but not in the city. The exact location falls under the category of "Beyond Thane (City)". So, can the society still ask us to get the will (If any) mandatorily probated?
Answer :
You've hit upon a critical point regarding probate requirements in India, specifically in Maharashtra.
The Law on Mandatory Probate (for Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains):
The requirement for mandatory probate of a Will for Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, and Jains is primarily governed by Section 57 read with Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
These sections state that probate is mandatory only in specific circumstances:
-
If the Will is made within the territories that were, on September 1, 1870, subject to the Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, or within the local limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Judicature at Madras or Bombay (Mumbai).
-
If the Will relates to immovable property situated within those specified territories/limits, even if the Will was made outside those territories.
What this means for Thane (Beyond City Limits):
Since your property is located in Thane district but outside the municipal limits of Mumbai city, it does not fall under the mandatory probate requirement as per Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
Therefore, legally, the society cannot mandatorily ask you to get the Will probated if there was one.
However, there's a practical nuance:
While not legally mandatory, societies (and even banks or other institutions) sometimes insist on probate even when it's not strictly required by law. This is for their own administrative ease and to completely eliminate any future risk or dispute, as a probate granted by a court is an irrefutable proof of the Will's authenticity and the executor's authority.
Why they might still ask:
-
Risk Aversion: A society deals with many members and various legal situations. A probated Will offers the highest level of legal certainty.
-
Lack of Awareness: The society's legal advisor might be applying a blanket policy or might not be fully aware of the specific nuances of Section 57 for areas outside the strict presidency town limits.
-
Absence of Will (in your case): In your situation, you explicitly stated "there is no will in place." So, the question of probating a will doesn't even arise. If a will were to be "created" now (which you know is illegal), and you presented it, the society would be highly justified in asking for probate, especially given its backdated nature.
Your best approach remains to strongly emphasize the nomination your mother made under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, coupled with the Indemnity Bond and Affidavit. This combination should provide the society with sufficient legal comfort to proceed with the transfer, as it addresses both the statutory obligation (due to nomination) and their concern for risk (due to indemnity).