Legal Opinion on Proposed Transaction Structure
Background Summary:
You propose to acquire rights in an industrial plot allotted by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNIDA), presently held by a Muslim allottee. As per GNIDA rules, transfer of such plots is restricted unless the following conditions are fulfilled:
-
The building on the plot must be constructed and a Completion Certificate (CC) issued.
-
The project must be made functional (in line with its designated ITES/BPO use), and a Functional Certificate must be obtained from GNIDA.
The seller, who is only an investor and not engaged in any IT/ITES activity, intends to sell the plot prior to completing construction or making the unit functional. To circumvent the restriction, he proposes a structure involving an Agreement to Sell (ATS), an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney (SPA), and a registered Will, while accepting full payment in cash and cheque.
1. Can stamp duty paid on the Agreement to Sell (approx. 6%) be adjusted during registry of the final conveyance deed?
As per the current legal position under the Uttar Pradesh Stamp Act and prevailing GNIDA practices, stamp duty paid on an unregistered or even registered Agreement to Sell is not adjustable against the stamp duty payable at the time of execution of the final transfer deed (sub-lease or conveyance). Unless the State Government has issued a specific notification allowing such adjustment, which as of now it has not, you will be required to pay full stamp duty again at the time of final registry or lease transfer.
Recommendation: Execute the Agreement to Sell on nominal stamp paper (Rs. 100) and keep the main duty reserved for the actual transfer at a later stage when GNIDA allows execution of the Transfer Memorandum and registration of title.
2. Is stamp duty applicable on an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney (SPA)?
Yes. Under the Indian Stamp Act as applicable in Uttar Pradesh, an irrevocable SPA—especially one authorizing another person to carry out acts such as construction, dealing with GNIDA, applying for CC/FC, executing Transfer Memorandum, and representing before the Sub-Registrar—will attract stamp duty. If the SPA is construed as being coupled with interest or conveying substantial rights over immovable property (i.e., having elements akin to sale or transfer), the applicable stamp duty could be up to the same as for a conveyance deed.
Recommendation: The SPA should be carefully drafted to avoid language that suggests transfer of interest or ownership. Limit its scope to administrative powers, with construction responsibility clearly delegated but without conferring alienation rights.
3. Can the original allottee cause trouble after executing the SPA and ATS, particularly at the stage of applying for CC, FC, Transfer Memorandum, or final registration?
Yes. Despite having executed an ATS and SPA, the original allottee remains the legal and beneficial owner of the plot until GNIDA permits the transfer and the sub-lease is executed in your company's name. Therefore, the allottee can still:
-
Refuse to cooperate with GNIDA procedures.
-
Delay or obstruct construction approvals, submission of forms, or final registry.
-
Refuse to sign the Transfer Memorandum at the time of title transfer.
-
Deny the authenticity or intent of the SPA or Will, thereby complicating the transfer.
ATS and SPA do not amount to title transfer and do not bind GNIDA, which only recognizes ownership after registration of the transfer in its records.
Recommendation: Include strict penal and indemnity clauses in the ATS to compel cooperation. However, enforcement will still require litigation if the allottee becomes uncooperative.
4. Can the Muslim allottee later execute a Hiba (gift) or Wakf, thereby undermining your rights?
Yes. Under Muslim personal law, a Hiba (gift) can be made orally or in writing, and is valid if three essential elements are fulfilled: declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession. A Muslim allottee may execute a Hiba in favor of a family member or unrelated third party, even after having executed an SPA or ATS, so long as he is the legal owner. Similarly, creation of a Wakf is valid in law and irrevocable.
Since SPA and ATS do not extinguish ownership rights, the allottee legally retains the right to dispose of the property until registry is complete. This exposes your investment to a significant legal risk.
Recommendation: Obtain an undertaking from the seller not to execute any Hiba, gift, or third-party transfer pending final registry. Though not binding on third parties, this may provide a basis for equitable relief in court.
5. What precautions can be taken to protect your investment of Rs. 2 crores towards construction and sale consideration?
Given that GNIDA prohibits transfer until issuance of Completion and Functional Certificates, and considering that substantial funds will be deployed for construction and part-payment of sale consideration, the following precautions are essential:
-
Execute a detailed and registered Agreement to Sell with milestone-linked payments.
-
Use escrow arrangements to defer major payments until GNIDA approvals are achieved.
-
Include detailed indemnity, arbitration, and refund clauses in ATS and SPA.
-
Obtain specific undertaking from the seller to not revoke SPA, execute any Hiba, or deal with the property until final registration.
-
Execute development agreement (if permissible under GNIDA rules) giving your company permission to construct and use the premises.
-
Ensure that the SPA authorizes construction, application for CC/FC, and representation before GNIDA, but avoids conferring any sale rights to avoid stamp duty complications.
6. What other legal risks are present in light of property value appreciation and the seller’s urgency?
Several legal and practical risks exist:
-
Change in GNIDA policy or refusal to transfer the plot after completion, if the transaction structure appears to circumvent their rules.
-
Valuation disputes—the seller may later demand higher consideration citing market escalation.
-
Revocation of SPA or disputes among seller’s family in case of death or incapacity.
-
Involuntary cancellation of allotment by GNIDA for breach of development conditions.
-
Litigation risk—if seller refuses to cooperate at the final stage, your only recourse will be to file a suit for specific performance or damages.
Given the appreciation potential, the seller’s desperation to sell before cancellation, and the regulatory restrictions, the seller has every incentive to cooperate until he receives payment, but may not act in your interest thereafter.
7. Conclusion and Legal Position
While the proposed structure of Agreement to Sell, Irrevocable SPA, and Will may appear workable for the time being, it does not create any legal title in your favour until GNIDA allows the Transfer Memorandum and the lease is officially registered in your company's name. Until then, you bear significant financial and legal risk. Under Indian law, and as reinforced by the Supreme Court in Suraj Lamp Industries v. State of Haryana (2012), SPA, ATS, and Will do not constitute title transfer and cannot be relied upon to claim ownership.
Therefore, extreme caution is advised. If you still wish to proceed, ensure that all documentation is professionally drafted, indemnity and enforcement provisions are included, and payments are made in stages, not in full upfront.