Gift deed was executed 20 years back
2) when did you become aware of fraudulent gift deed
3) suit to set aside gift deed has to be filed within period of 3 years of discovery of fraudulent gift deed
Hi, V got made a gift deed and in deed related area mentioned was 75 sq yds where as property was 750sq yds. Conveyance deed was made by him after6 years for an area of 750 sq yds. The gift deed was grossly undervalued as it was misrepresented As 75 sq yds to pay taxes? Or maybe the Donor (V’s father) was in the impression that he was gifting only 75 sq yds as there are other children. Can gift be revoked for fraud and misrepresentation considering the issue above. The gift was made in 2005, conveyance 2011, donor died 2009, gift challenger in family dispute in 2006. Kindly advise best course of action. Thanks
Gift deed was executed 20 years back
2) when did you become aware of fraudulent gift deed
3) suit to set aside gift deed has to be filed within period of 3 years of discovery of fraudulent gift deed
As I mentioned in the question it was challenged in 2006 in a partition suit. Thanks
Kindly respond Sir as I had already mentioned in my question that the gift was challenged within one year
You have good case on merits
sale deed can be set aside as only 75 square yards gifted and not 750 yards
Basically the property was acquired by a registered gift deed and the extent of property gifted was only 75 sq yards.
If the donee had subsequently transferred 750 Sq yards instead of 75 Sq yards then it is not valid
Moreover somebody has filed a suit for partition immediately on the next year of execution of gift deed, if the suit has not been disposed yet then you may have wait for the disposal.
The gift was challenged within three years from the date of its execution hence it is very well within the time limit.
The gift deed can be challenged and the suit for revocation is also maintainable because of the gross error in the extent of the property.
Thanks you . Do we need to do a new case or the partition case ( even though on false ground of HUF property but ownership is an issue in the suit) will get to the bottom of this? The donee is yet to be cross examined yet.
No need to file fresh suit as you have challenged gift deed
I presume you have also challenged sale deed
Continue with the partition suit; it covers ownership issues. Cross-examine the donee to prove misrepresentation. If fraud is established, the court can set aside the excess transfer. No need for a new case.
For detailed, personalized advice, consider a phone consultancy. Hope you find the information helpful. You are free to contact me for further discussion. If you could spare two minutes of your time to write a review, it would be greatly appreciated and bring immense happiness to read it. Thank you. Shubham Goyal.
Hi,
As per gift deed, it there is mention of 75 Sq. Yds only then that person can create conveyance deed of more than that. The case is fit for challenge.
Since the gift deed was challenged in 2006 in a partition suit, the issue of ownership and misrepresentation can be addressed within the same suit, provided the pleadings already raise concerns about fraud and misrepresentation. If the existing partition suit does not explicitly cover the validity of the gift deed, you may need to amend the pleadings to incorporate these claims.
Legal Grounds for Challenging the Gift Deed
Fraud & Misrepresentation (Section 17 of Indian Contract Act, 1872)
Lack of Donor's Consent (Section 122 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882)
Non-Delivery of Possession
Partition Suit’s Role
Best Course of Action
Check Pleadings in the Partition Suit
Challenge the Conveyance Deed
Obtain Documentary Evidence
Cross-Examine the Donee
Would you like assistance in drafting an amendment application or a fresh suit for cancellation of the gift deed?
Thanks and Regards,
Advocate Aman Verma
Legal Corridor
- As per law , once the gift deed is registered then it cannot be cancelled without a valid reason and after the demise of the donor.
- If the said gift deed is registered for only 75 sq.yds out of 750 then this cannot be challenged on the ground that it was wrongly mentioned less portion of land.
- Further, as the donor registered the gift deed for 75 sq.yds in 2005 and died in 2009 ,it means that the gift deed was challenged during his life time.
- Since, there is already a Partition suit is pending before the Court then another case on the same cause of action not maintainable.
First you may watch the developments in the case, in the event of any further necessity, you may discuss with your advocate to file either a suit for partition or declaration based on the circumstances
Dear Client,
Since the gift deed (2005) mentioned an area of 75 sq yds, whereas the conveyance deed (2011) states 750 sq yds, and the donor (V’s father) passed away in 2009, the discrepancy in the arearaises concerns of either fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. If the donor intended to gift only 75 sq yds, but the donee later obtained a conveyance deed for the full 750 sq yds, this can be challenged in court. Given that the partition suit was already filed in 2006, the issue of ownership and validity of the gift deed can be addressed within the same case rather than filing a new one. Since ownership is already in dispute, and the donee has yet to be cross-examined, this presents an opportunity to challenge the validity of the gift deed during trial. A gift deed can be revoked on grounds of fraud or misrepresentation if it is proven that the donee misrepresented the area to avoid taxes or gain an unfair advantage. Additionally, if the donor had other children and did not intend to gift the entire 750 sq yds, the court may consider whether the donor’s consent was obtained with full understanding. The best course of action is to continue pursuing the partition suit, ensure that the discrepancy in area is raised during cross-examination of the donee, and argue that the gift deed was either fraudulently executed or based on a misunderstanding, making it invalid. Since the gift was challenged within a year, this strengthens the claim, and the partition suit can address the issue without needing a new case, provided ownership and the validity of the gift are already part of the pleadings. Given the complexity of the matter, engaging a property lawyer to handle the cross-examination and legal strategy will be crucial in proving fraud or misrepresentation.