judgments depend upon facts of each case 

2) Suppression of material facts by a party is a sufficient ground to decline discretionary relief.

3) n Ram Saran vs. IG of Police, CRPF and others, (2006) 2 SCC 541, the Apex Court observed thus:

A person who seeks equity must come with clean hands. He, who comes to the court with false claims, cannot plead equity nor would the court be justified to exercise equity jurisdiction in his favour. A person who seeks equity must act in a fair and equitable manner. ...............

The Delhi High Court has said that a wife cannot be entitled to maintenance by the husband when she is highly qualified and has been earning even after her marriage, though she does not truthfully disclose her true income.upheld  a family court order dismissing a wife’s application for maintenance under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, 

2) 

Mamta Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal, Madhya Pradesh High Court Civil Revision No.1290 of 1999 decided on 24.03.2000.

In this case the Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh has held that well qualified spouses desirous of remaining idle, not making efforts for purpose of finding out a source of livelihood, have to be discouraged. It is further held that a lady, who is fighting matrimonial litigation filed for Divorce, cannot be permitted to sit idle and to put her burden on the Husband for demanding pendente lite alimony from him during pendency of such matrimonial petition. Section 24 is not mean for creating an army of idle person who would be sitting idle waiting for a "dole" to be awarded by her Husband who has got a grievance against her and who has gone to the court for seeking relief against her.

3) 

Bhushan Kumar Meen Vs. Mansi Meen SLP (Crl) 7924 of 2008 Supreme Court .

In this case while reducing the maintenance amount from Rs.10000/- to Rs.5000/- granted by the lower court to the wife, the Supreme Court observed that " we cannot also shut our eyes to the fact that at present the respondent wife is not employed or at least there is nothing on record to indicate that she is employed in any gainful work. However having regard to the qualifications that she possesses, there is no reason why she ought not to be in a position to also maintain herself in the future

Fraud must mean representing as existing what is not and concealing what is material. The misrepresentation or  concealment necessarily presupposes that the respondent was aware of the facts and circumstances which were misrepresented or concealed.Every fact and circumstance cannot be materials. Therefore,concealment of misrepresentation of every fact and circumstances cannot be said to be fraud sufficient for annulment. It is difficult to define with any certainty what can be said to be material fact or circumstance but it may be safely said that the fact or circumstance which is of such nature as would materially interfere with the marital life and pleasure including sexual pleasure will be a material fact or circumstance. The only limitation is that the material fact, or circumstance must be concerning the respondent, meaning thereby that it must be in respect of the person or character of the respondent

It’s a short duration for judgements as your arguments date is very close 

Dear client,

It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation involving multiple cases and a history of conflicts between the parties. It's essential to approach the final arguments systematically, focusing on the key points that support your position. Here's a breakdown of how you might organize your arguments:

1. Concealment and False Information: Highlight the deliberate concealment of the actual date of birth and previous divorce through the matrimonial website. Emphasize the importance of honesty and transparency in matrimonial alliances and how the concealment affected the subsequent legal proceedings.

2. Pattern of Behavior: Present a pattern of behavior wherein the individual has allegedly used similar methods in a previous marriage to obtain divorce through threats of false cases. Stress the significance of this pattern in demonstrating a modus operandi.

3. Educational and Employment Background: Establish the educational qualifications and professional status of the individual before marriage to showcase competency and capability.

4. Non-Compliance with Compromise Terms: Highlight instances where the individual did not comply with the terms of the compromise set by the court. Explain how this lack of compliance affected the resolution of the annulment case and the FIR against her.

5. Abandonment of Matrimonial Home and Filing of Multiple Cases: Discuss the sudden departure from the matrimonial home without reason and subsequent filing of maintenance cases. Show inconsistencies in behavior and decisions, emphasizing the impact on the marital relationship.

6. No Children Involved: Emphasize the absence of children from both the previous and current marriages to underscore the absence of additional complexities.

7. Communications and Allegations to HB's Employer: Address the attempts to involve the spouse's employer and allegations made against the spouse, highlighting any potential defamation or harassment.

8. Divorce Petition and Restoration: Clarify the status of the divorce petition, explaining any challenges faced in appearing for the proceedings and intentions to file it in another jurisdiction.

You can reach out to us for further assistance