Ownership and construction of partitioned property
Hello, an inherited plot and existing building on it in Delhi was partioned by high court order between my mother and two sisters by metes and bounds. The property was leasehold and has now been converted to freehold but the LDO authority has given joint conveyance deed only stating my mother's % ownership but not the exact demarcations from high court order (but they have referred to the order in list of documents). The conveyance deed was registered at sub registrar office and my mother has a copy of it. The two sisters have entered an agreement to sell with a builder who has demolished existing construction on his side to do reconstruction. My questions are the following:
1. Does my mother have to submit the conveyance deed anywhere else? Eg: MCD etc.
2. Does she need any other document except conveyance deed and high court order to show that she is rightful owner of her area? Does she need some kind of title certificate to be made in addition for her land area?
3. As the authorities are not recognising the high court partition as subdivision of plot, only one map for full plot will get made for construction. If she also gets her area constructed, then will all the flats on her land portion automatically be owned by her or does she need to get some title certificate for each flat from authorities, and from where?
4. What can my mother do to protect her land portion rights from the builder? We are thinking to get some kind of legal agreement made.
My mother is elderly so would prefer not to take legal action against builder and/or authorities if it can be avoided. Please advise accordingly.
Thanks and regards,
Asked 3 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
Hello thank you very much for your replies. I am providing some additional information below as clarifications-
First, I would like to clarify that the 'builder' that I referred to is the builder who bought my masi's share. So we are thinking to make a legal agreement to protect against him.
Q.a) Would this legal agreement also need to be registered?
Second, I would like to clarify that my statement that conveyance deed mentions high court order may be oversimplified. The joint conveyance deed mentions my mothers share in % as 'undivided' but mentions the substitution letter, the substitution letter also says % share and 'undivided' but mentions the high court order in the list of documents, the high court order writes that the demarcations of partitioned property are according to the settlement deed that the three sisters agreed on, and the settlement deed exactly defines the boundaries of each sister by metes and bounds.
I do hope that as there is a trail of documents, the high court order is still valid although L&DO refused to acknowledge the division of plot. But i am concerned that proving ownership based on 4 different connected documents might be complicated. As I mentioned, due to her advanced age my mom did not want to take legal action against LDO.
Q.b) If your answers have changed based on this additional information, I would be thankful if you could let me know.
Q.c) And any advise on how to protect my mother's interest going forward would be very appreciated. Thanks and best regards.
Asked 3 years ago