Recovery warrant for husband located abroad in CrPC 125(3) case
While I chose the family law category, the advice I need is about a criminal statute, specifically CrPC 125 (interim maintenance of wife).
Husband H and Wife W got married in Uttarakhand in 2015. Immediately upon marriage they flew to their marital home in country C, where H worked. They lived together for about 2 months, and then W returned to India. In 2017, W filed for divorce on the grounds of cruelty. The matter is languishing in the family court.
Within a few months of filing the HMA 13(1)(ia), W filed for interim maintenance under CrPC 125 with false information/facts. The summons for H were served within town to his estranged father, who wrote a letter to the court explaining that H is estranged to him, and has not lived in India for many years. No attempt was made to serve summons to H at his address in country C.
After a few dates, in Jan 2019, based on the false information provided by W, the family court passed an ex parte order against H for a large amount of monthly maintenance. Subsequently, through his lawyer, when H became aware of the case and the order, he filed an application for restoration under CrPC 126(2) in April 2019.
2.5 years later, the family court still steadfastly refuses to rule on the CrPC 126(2) application filed by H. In the meantime, the ex parte order stands and the arrears keep growing. A couple of recovery orders/warrants have been passed. W's lawyer has also applied to have the recovery order sent to Ministry of Foreign Affairs for action via the Indian embassy in country C.
QUESTIONS
1. Legally, can H petition the Uttarakhand High Court in Nainital to direct the family court to rule on H's CrPC 126(2) application? In practice, if he does that, what are the chances of success?
2. Can H petition the Nainital High Court to direct the family court to grant H's CrPC 126(2) request? What are the chances of success?
3. Favorable ruling on 126(2) usually translates into automatic annullment of the 125 order, and any pending 125(3) recoveries. At the same time, while ruling favorably on 126(2) courts ask the petitioner to deposit a certain amount. Can H petition the Nainital High Court to direct the family court that any such deposit amount must not be greater than 3 months (i.e. between ex parte order under 125 in Jan 2019 and restoration application under 126(2) in Apr 2019) worth of maintenance per the annulled order? What are the chances of success? What statutes, precedents or argumentations can be cited/made?
4. What enforcement mechanisms for 125(3) are available to the embassies and Ministry of Foreign Affairs? Does the family court have the authority to direct the embassy/MFA or can only High Court/Supreme Court do that?
Asked 4 years ago in Family Law
Religion: Hindu
#3 - Does that mean 50% of the arrears for 2.5 years? Or 50% of the amount for 3 months?
#4 - "Request" sounds different from "Order". Or is it term of art that means the same thing?
"Assistance" in what?
What form might such "assistance take"?
Asked 4 years ago