Court ACMM proceeding against a fraud by property developer is slow and seems not favoring victims
During Feb 2008, Mr Srinivas Chowdhury & Sri.Hanumantharaya KM (joint Property Developers)
have cheated me (along with 40 more buyers), absconding with the advance money (about 3.50 Lakhs) paid for the purpose of residential sites they offered to sell. After I lodged a Police Complaint individually in crime No 354 of 2010 in Jayanagar police station, as well as jointly along with other buyers,
The main accused Chaudhary (80% share) was once arrested and charge sheeted for his default by the Jayanagar Police (FTC14 - Criminal Misc. No 4740/2009) , and eventually bailed out in court.
Thereafter he remained absconding / untraced., changing his residences across Bangalore / Hyderabad. I approached an advocate for legal help and he issued legal notice (Rs 10000/- for two of my cases) as initial process to initiate legal process. But, as the accused gone missing and has shifted his residence / office, it did not serve any purpose.
Post Jul 2011, the Police started notifying all complainants to deposit original papers (Agreement, Payment Receipts and Bank Transaction Statements) with the Police Station Jayanagar. I deposited the documents with Police in Nov 2012.
A case was filed (CC24802/12 ) in II Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM-II) Court for my complaint FIR 354/10 on 13 Dec 2012. Subsequently, another case CC14308/13 for the joint complaint and few more for the individual complaints were also filed in (ACMM-II) Court
With these charges the court proceedings I attended from 12 Feb 2016 is summarized below.
Chaudhary and other accused attended first three hearings and kept asking 2-3 months’ time to arrange money, and the Judge kept stressed upon him to return every one's dues. Chaudhry gone missing after 25 Apr 2016 and thereafter only Hanumantharaya kept attending the meeting.
His Advocate Uday indicated no help as the 2-3 acre land Chaudhary acquired is attached to court and he is unable to sell and sum up funds.
Chaudhary remained absent for all hearing until 27 Aug 2019, when he self-appeared in court. His advocate advanced bail application. As judge was not present, reader shifted the hearing to Annex Complex at 3 PM. Meanwhile Jayanagar Police arrested Chaudhary & taken him to Jayanagar Police custody at 1PM. At 3 PM Chaudhary's advocate got him bail.
On 23 Sep 2019 Judge was not present. Chaudhary's advocate got possession & updated the case file. It appeared that Chaudhary is in the process of getting his land released. PPO explained that the settlement part is out of court proceeding & Chaudhary is agreeing to settle the dues. Every one appeared to be working in favor of Chaudhary while all complainants' appeared clueless the way court proceeding going on. Reader announced next date 16 Nov.
The PPO suggesting that civil court might not help much as she is trying to get buyers their dues, at least the principal amount. Please advise best course of actions
Asked 6 years ago in Criminal Law
Religion: Hindu