• Section 29 A of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989

This is regarding agricultural land in Tamilnadu state. The members are Hindu religion.

1.Male G1-M (Generation1-Male) purchased the agricultural land and died in 1934.

2.G2-Son1 (Generation2-Son1)is a only son of G1-M.
 The land patta transferred to G2-Son1 name after G1-M died and G2-Son1 using the land.

3. 
G2-Son1 married Wife1 and then born G3-Daughter1(Generation 3 daughter-1) and after few month the Wife1 died.
G2-Son1 married Wife2 and then born in 1950 G3-Son1(Generation 3 son-1) and after few month the Wife2 died.
"G3-Daughter1 is daughter of G2-Son1, G3-Son1 is son of G2-Son1."

4.
G2-Son1 died in year 1983. The land patta was in G2-Son1 name till year Aug-2013.
The G3-Daughter1 married in 1969 or before.

For this scenario question is: 
A. As per Section 29 A of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989 was inserted w.e.f 15.03.1989.
The agricultural land any part goes to G3-Daughter1? As The G3-Daughter1 married 1969 or before and her father G2-Son1 died before 1989 so the 100% agricultural land goes to G3-Son1 only?
B. OR The agricultural land goes to G3-Son1 50% and G3-Daughter1 50% even their father G2-Son1 died in 1983 and the G3-Daughter1 married in year 1969 or before ?

Please provide clarification for A and B based on the provided details considering the G2-Son1 death year and G3-Daughter1 marriage year and Section 29 A of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989 and any other relevant law section details. Provide with relevant law section also.
Asked 4 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu

11 answers received from multiple lawyers

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

11 Answers

amendment brought by Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 1990 to Hindu Succession Act with effect from 25.3.1989, by which the Section 29-A was inserted to the Hindu Succession Act, an unmarried daughter of the Hindu Coparcener is recorded as coparcener by birth.

 

2) Section 29-A is a special provision giving a statutory right to a daughter treating her as a coparcener in the family and if such right by birth is given to the daughter, it must mean that she gets the right by birth in the family properties from the date of her birth and it is not a right that would accrue only on the commencement of the Tamil NaduAmendment Act, 1989.”

 

3)daughter and son would have equal share in property 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94817 Answers
7557 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

By virtue of the Tamil Nadu Amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, brought into force

  • Clause (iv) of Section 29-A provides that a daughter married before the commencementof Hindu Succession  (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act1989 is not entitled to her share in the coparcenary properties, if an unmarried daughter born before the date of commencement of the HinduSuccession (Tamil Nadu AmendmentAct, than that daughter is entitled to get share in coparcenary property.

Ganesh Kadam
Advocate, Pune
12932 Answers
255 Consultations

4.9 on 5.0

Madras High Court

Janarthanan vs Vijaya on 24 June, 2015

Mohammed Mujeeb
Advocate, Hyderabad
19299 Answers
32 Consultations

4.7 on 5.0

Yes presently the right of daughter is revived since birth for the right in property

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
31968 Answers
181 Consultations

4.1 on 5.0

Dear Sir,

The following information may kindly be read:

Tamil Nadu:

After Chapter II, insert the following Chapter, namely:—

“Chapter IIA

Succession by survivorship

29A. Equal rights to daughter in coparcenary property.— Notwithstanding anything contained in section 6 of this Act,—

(i) in a joint Hindu family governed by Mitakshara Law, the daughter of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener in her own right in thesame manner as a son and have the same rights in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son, inclusive of the right to claim by survivorship; and shall be subject to the same liabilities and disabilities in respect thereto as the son;

(ii) at a partition in such a Joint Hindu Family the coparcenary property shall be so divided as to allot to a daughter the same share as is allotable to son:

Provided that the share which a pre-deceased son or a pre-deceased daughter would have got at the partition if he or she had been alive at the time of the partition shall be allotted to the surviving child of such pre-deceased son or of such pre-deceased daughter:

Provided further that the share allotable to the pre-deceased child of pre-deceased son or of a pre-deceased daughter, if such child had been alive at the time of the partition, shall be allotted to the child of such pre-deceased child of the pre-deceased son or of the pre-deceased daughter, as the case may be;

(iii) any property to which a female Hindu becomes entitled by virtue of the provisions of clause (i) shall be held by her with the incidents of coparcenary ownership and shall be regarded, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, as property capable of being disposed of by her by will or other testamentary disposition:

(iv) nothing in this Chapter shall apply to a daughter married before the date of the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989;

(v) nothing in clause (ii) shall apply to a partition which had been effected before the date of the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989.

29B. Interest to devolve by survivorship on death.— When a female Hindu dies after the date of the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989, having at the time of her death, an interest in a Mitakshara coparcenary property by virtue of the provisions of section 29A, her interest in the property shall devolve by survivorship upon the surviving members of the coparcenary and not in accordance with this Act:

Provided that if the deceased had left any child or child of a pre-deceased child, the interest of the deceased in the Mitakshara coparcenary property shall devolve by testamentary or intestate succession, as the case may be, under this Act and not by survivorship.

Explanation I.— For the purposes of this section, the interest of a female Hindu Mitakshara coparcener shall be deemed to be the share in the property that would have been allotted to her if a partition of the property had taken place immediately before her death, irrespective of whether she was entitled to claim partition or not.

Explanation II.— Noting contained in the proviso to this section shall be construed as enabling a person who, before the death of the deceased had separated himself or herself from the coparcenary or any of his or her heirs to claim on intestacy a share in the interest referred to therein.

29C. Preferential right to acquire property in certain cases.— (1) Where, after the date of the commencement of the Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1989, an interest in any immovable property of an intestate or in any business carried on by him or her, whether solely or in conjunction with others, devolves under section 29A or section 29B upon two or more heirs, and any one of such heirs proposes to transfer his or her interest in the property or business, the other heirs shall have a preferential right to acquire the interest proposed to be transferred.

(2) The consideration for which any interest in the property of the deceased may be transferred under this section shall, in the absence of any agreement between the parties, be determined by the court on application being made to it in this behalf, and if any person proposing to acquire the interest is not willing to acquire it for the consideration so determined, such person shall be liable to pay all costs of, or incidental to, the application.

(3) If there are two or more heirs proposing to acquire any interest under this section, that heir who offers the highest consideration for the transfer shall be preferred.

Explanation.— In this section “court” means the court within the limits of whose jurisdiction the immovable property is situate or the business is carried on and includes any other court which the s tate Government may, by notification in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, specify in this behalf.

Netravathi Kalaskar
Advocate, Bengaluru
4952 Answers
27 Consultations

4.8 on 5.0

It does not go to son only daughter has equal share in property 

 

2)both son and daughter get 50 per cent share each 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94817 Answers
7557 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

A) yes but it will also go to other legal heirs also

B) Yes

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
31968 Answers
181 Consultations

4.1 on 5.0

No G3 daughter 1 will get equal share from the property of G2 son1

 

Mohit Kapoor
Advocate, Rohtak
10687 Answers
7 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Land will inherit 50% each and due to intestate succession and birth of 4th generation, land has resumes ancestral/coparcenery status. 

Succession opened in 1983, daughter inherited 50% share.

Yogendra Singh Rajawat
Advocate, Jaipur
22661 Answers
31 Consultations

4.4 on 5.0

You do not have to strain to rope in the latest amendment passed by TN in this regard.

This is not an ancestral property in the hands of third generation son or daughter.

Since their grandfather transferred the property to hi son (G-2), it becomes G-2's own and absolute property.

Now upon intestate death of G-2, the properties left behind by him shall devolve equally among his legal heirs consisting his son and daughter born to two wives.

Therefore the daughter is having an equal rights in the property as per Hindu succession act, 1956.

 

 

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
85022 Answers
2208 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

q-1:  The daughter G-3 is having equal rights in her father's properties at par with her male counterpart.

Q-2:   Same answer as stated above.

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
85022 Answers
2208 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer