• Bogus patta and subsequent Deeds

Sir,
kindly study the case thoroughly and advice me."D" is my grand mother.Property is under dispute since 2013.

1.A got 22 cent for lease from father..
2.Then A given 11 cent to B for lease.
3.Then B given it to C,and finally C to D.After land reform act D got patta for 11 cent from Land tribunal-L1
4.A also got patta for remaining 11 cent from Land tribunal-1
5.After 10 years A destroyed patta from Land Tribunal-1 and by hiding previous transaction and loopholes in local measurement system, got 18 cent patta from land tribunal-L2.
6.Then A transferred 18 cent title to descents(actual land under A's possession during that time was 13.72 cent,including excess 2.72 cent)
7.After 30 years Descents of A claiming right over property occupied and possessed by descents of D.

Main obstacle:
1.No document available in Taluk office for A's 1st patta from Land Tribunal-L1 (land Tribunal dissolved) 
2.A road was going through the property.This disputed property is at the opposite side of my house.Now they are arguing that disputed land has been under their possession.
3.All the measurements in documents were in local measurement system(aashari Kol).It is not definite,varies slightly from place to place.However there is a common conversion system used by revenue and registration officials but it is not written anywhere.Nothing is available under RTI.
4.Commission is not considering previous documents,they are just surveying as per new false document.From their report a leymen will think that part of D's property (belonging D's home=undisputed) is not the part of A's 1st document.
5.Commission is not competent,Although surveyors submit correct Plan of the property,commission always giving wrong and confusing information.
6.A's descents has been paining Tax for 18 cent until disputed.
8.In encumbrance certificate transaction are shown correctly.Ancient local measurement is shown correctly.As per their certificate,22-11=18.They mentioned equivalent measurement of local measurement are 22 and 11 cent correctly however 18 cent is shown wrongly.
9.I can not argue with him,I can not enter into disputed property,He is misusing political influence and SC atrocity acts.He is a Rowdy.I am surviving because of mobile camera.

Favourable points;

1.East-west north-south Measurement given in As descents new document is same as that given in 1st document of A.(measurement corresponds to 11 cent property not deduced)

2.Their east-west north-south measurement are not covering property properly.But D's measurement are perfect and cover property entirely.

3.D's Descents possess all documents until disputed, possession certificate,Tax receipt,Legal heir certificate,correct Encumbrance certificate,patta,Proper Deed.