Head: how to implead the proper party in an ejectment suit; to set aside fraud by lessor
1. I was a Managing Director in a pvt. Ltd. Company. That company bought machinery worth 50 lacs , housed in a godown.. I signed the 1st lease deed binding the company. There was a fight with co-director, I had to transfer my shares, without consideration., on death threats. Matter came to court. Cognizance taken,.
2. In the meanwhhile. The lessor forced me to do a temporary lease deed ( 2nd deed ) till the fight is over. I had to yield, or otherwise, the costly machinery would have damaged by lessor . I signed in the interest of the company. I could not sign on behalf of the company, since, I am no longer its MD
3. The machinery is still housed there, after 3 years. The company declaring its title over the machinery in its balance sheet, did not pay rent.
4. the lessor put a suit on me suppressing the facts., for rent and possession.; she is in collusion with the present directors, who are using the company as a façade.
I put an application to implead the company, since it is proper party. I neither have possession ( keys are with the company) nor entitled to pay
5. the court told me , no care taker capacity at all; tiltle of machiney not relevant. Etc .rejected impleadment.
6. High court did not see the logic of substance over form : or my caretaker capacity, or that the natural justice, expects the machinery owner to be heard.
7. Supreme court said , don’t worry suit fails, if you are not the tenant.
8. here: defacto tenant is the company, claiming ownership of machinery.
Mere temporary lease deed is in my name;
9. my advct is not able to help. He says , I cant claim lien over machinery also. I cant sell the machinery ;The lessor advocate is extra influential.
A; How to press my care taker capacity, to avoid a decree on me.
B : How to bring the company on record, to make it pay the rent and give possession ?
Asked 7 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
can you please tell me where the law is laid down that , when the first lease is not revoked means ( POSSESSION NOT AT ALL HANDED OVER BACK TO LESSOR ) , there cannot be a valid second lease deed. or any decision / citation on the point ? that will be a big relief for me..
Asked 7 years ago