Vacancy quashed by high court
Respected madams/sirs
01.i was selected as post graduate teacher(10+2 level-regular basis) at navodaya vidhayalaya on 05.02.2013,posted baikunthpur(chatisgarh),worked there and resigned on 16.09.2013,
02.as i am selected as junior lecturer(10+2 level-regular basis) in haryana with 1st rank in merit list,but i never joined this job,
03.as in between this i was selected for asst. professor(college cadre-regular basis) at klp college(govt. aided) on 21.09.2013 and working there till date.
04.the advetisement for this recruitment(02 vacancy-geography-asst. professor-klp college) is published on may 2013 and 50 candidate apply for that.
05.Vice-chancellor(MDU,Rohtak)nominated a selection committee as per UGC guideline for our assessment held on 02.09.2013 and selection panel result declared on [deleted]..
I(2nd rank) and jitender kumar(1st rank),two candidate selected as per our performance and we both joined on 21.09.2013.
05.now deepak kumar(4th rank) challenge the selection process on ground of bias at Punjab & Haryana high court,Chandigarh,He made allegation on Mr. Jitender kumar as given below-
a) Mrs. Leena,professor at MDU,Rohtak- a V.C. nominee-Subject expert in this committee is guide of Mr jitender kumar in PHD.She awards 18 marks to Mr jitender kumar in interview and 1 marks to Mr deepak kumar,and we replied-
NO INTEREFERENCE WITH EXPERTS DECISION:SUPREME COURT-LIST OF CASES
b )in application form Mr. jitender kumar filled 3 research paper but at time of interview he represent 5 research paper and got marks of 5 research paper,as he send 2 research paper for publication before last date filling application form but these paper published in-between last date of application and interview,and we replied-
UGC GUIDELINE IN WHICH A RESEARCH PAPER SEND DATE IS VALID DATE AND COUNTED FOR MARKS IF PUBLISHED BEFORE INTERVIEW.
c)Mrs. Leena,guide of Mr. Jitender kumar in PHD had mala-fide intention and give me only 1 mark,and she influence whole process of recruitment,and we replied
Mrs Leena is a highly reputed professor in university,she is guide of many students and in past also member of many selection committee where her many students applied and get selected.
here Reena Sharma(3rd rank) also her student in PHD but not selected so it is impossible to be biased personally as for Mrs Leena both Jitender kumar(1st rank) and Reena sharma(3rd rank) are student,if she biased then reena sharma also selected..it is impossible to influence the whole selection process(10 members committee) by Mrs. Leena where other VC-nominee-subject experts also reputed professor and their students(PHD) also participate in this vacancy.so there is no mala-fide intention by Mrs. Leena.
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke And Ors. vs Dr. B.S. Mahajan And Ors. on 6 December, 1989.
but high court(single bench) quash the vacancy on mala-fide intention even there is no allegation on me.
i applied for stay to double bench.
guide me & give judgements.
Asked 6 years ago in Labour
If this vacancy is quashed and I also get terminated then what next in my carrier or future.
As now I have family responsibility also and my husband recently undergoes kidney transplant.
It makes a huge difference in my potential to fight for a new job.
Can I join back any of above two NVS or State govt.
Or my future will be in dark.
Asked 6 years ago
As we discussed above case hc single bench quashed the recruitment and said college to start a fresh recruitment then I apply for stay in devisional bench but they guide college in mean Time not to start a fresh recruitment process. In this order there not mentioned to stay single bench order/quashed recruitment.
So my college not suspending me but stop my salary
Can college suspend or stop my salary if case is pending for hearing in devisional bench in high court.
Asked 5 years ago
dear advocates,
as above discussed
CWP NO. 12119 OF 2014 dated 17.05.18
The High Court Of Punjab and Haryana,Chandigarh
The Single Bench of High court said "The writ petition is allowed and the selection to the post of assistant professor in geography in question in the present writ petition is quashed. The respondents are at liberty to initiate a fresh selection process."
LPA-831-2018(O&M) dated 01.06.2018
The divisional bench said " In the meantime, the authorities may not initiate the fresh selection process. "
please suggest me
01. divisional bench order is a stay or not??
02. if this is stay on full decision of single bench a) quashed the selection process b) start of fresh recruitment ??
03. if this is stay on start of fresh recruitment only then can college terminate us as selection process is quashed??
04. if this is a stay order only on start of fresh recruitment then petitioner can proceed further for contempt of court on behalf of single bench order as college did not terminate/suspend us till date ??
please guide me
some people says this is a full stay, some says this is partial stay only on fresh recruitment and college can terminate you.
Asked 5 years ago