Shortage of land and encroachment, is it amounting to cheating?
I am a member of a Cooperative Housing Society in suburban Mumbai. Our CHS building was constructed by a promoter/builder who acquired a plot of land from landlords by an agreement in the year 1984 to develop, build, sell flats or units and then form CHS and transfer the land & building rights to society by way of conveyance deed from landlord.
The agreement for sale of flats/units (sale deeds) with the buyers were entered into in the year 1984-85 had mentioned plot area as 3190 sq. mt of which 700 sq.mt were set aside as slum area referring to a Deputy Collectors gazette announcement at that time. The balance area of plot that is 2490 sq mt was approved by BMC proposal dept for construction plan and accordingly the construction was carried out with 1:1 FSI calculation. This could certainly have been done after City Survey report submitted to BMC during apporval of construction proposal. The promoter/builder also erected compound walls all around during or after construction of building.
The CHS was formed and handed over to the members in the year 1987 but the builder was never willing to cooperate to convey the land and building in the name of the society giving silly reasons to our written requests. This ws a common problem in and around Mumbai as hardly 10-20% of housing societies got conveyance. Because of this the Govt. of Maharashtra device Deemed Conveyance system which really helped many societies to get conveyance.
We got our Deemed Conveyance in the year 2014-15 and thereafter we did adjudication, registration, stamp duty payment etc. When we applied for Property Card, we came to know about incomplete NA process by promoter/builder and hence we had complete the whole process and pay hefty penalty with interest.
At the same time, we hired an independent surveyor and carried out survey. To our dismay we are shocked to know that there is about 500 sq mt shortage of land area. That is about 2000 sq mt instead of 2490 sq mt which is about 20% !
We applied for City Survey office for total survey of subdivided land parcel including adjacent plots. The survey was conducted on 05.02.2018 and till date City Survey office is silent on the issue and verbally informs that they are unable to reconcile the measurements or area and giving the survey report. They verbally say the matter is being referred to the Collector. We have submitted a written request to provide us the Survey Report at the earliest.
We have a strong belief that a part of our plot has gone into encroachment other than 700 sq mt set aside by builder during construction. During the City Survey the concerned official was refusing to measure the adjacent pot of chawls, which is a part of our bigger parcel of land and a neighboring builder who is active on the other side is eyeing and prowling on that piece of land. Hence surveyor was reluctant and contentious that the entire land behind us comes under Collector.
Kindly help us to know the way forward.
Asked 6 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu
Thank you all for your opinions.
1. Is City Survey office duty-bound to provide us the Survey Report covering the entire piece of land 2490 sq mt utilized for FSI as per BMC approved plan, although a part of it has most probably gone into the adjacent chawls touching our backside compound wall, seems mistake of our builder.
If yes, are they suppose to demarcate our missing area of approx. 500 sq mt and show in the survey report. And again if yes, can we evict this 5-6 small chawls within this 500 sq mt area. Of course, they all expect and in waiting for compensation or rehab in case of redevelopment.
Asked 6 years ago