• Sale of agriculture land where cantonment board & municipal limit both exist

Dear sir/madam,
i have sold agriculture land at village pondha, dehradun which is 4 km from cantonment board(aerially).The population of cantonment board is 50000 approx.
Also the same land gets covered under municipality.The distance from municipality is 6 km(aerially) with population of more than 10 lacs as per last population census.
I want to know when both cantonment board & municipality exist what are the consequences & which of them will supersede the other.
Also please provide case laws for cantonment board superseding municipality.
Thanks
Asked 8 years ago in Taxation

Ask a question and receive multiple answers in one hour.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

3 Answers

Hello,

The words "within its own jurisdictional area" with reference to a municipality would mean that particular areas over which that municipality has jurisdiction as a municipality.You may refer to the following judgment where this issue has been discussed in detail:

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/902095/?type=print

Let me know if I can be of further help.

Regards

Anilesh Tewari
Advocate, New Delhi
18103 Answers
377 Consultations

Hi, the maintanace of land if done by municipal corporation , it shall be coverd under it .. The jurisdiction shall be with one authority and cannot claimed by both .. You can get the details by filing an RTI in the muncipality office and the Cantonment regarding the jurisdiction

Hemant Chaudhary
Advocate, Gurgaon
4632 Answers
67 Consultations

What is that you wanted to know about this especially when you have already sold the property?

There has been considerable news and reputation damage to the real estate sector in Uttarakhand on account of the alleged ban on buying property in the State. Even today, most investors and prospective buyers are under the misguided notion that one cannot purchase property in the State of Uttarakhand or some believe that one can buy, but only to a certain extent.

ection 154(3) was added by the Amendment Act which restricted sale of land by a ‘bhumidar’ “to any of the categories of tenure holders in the State of Uttaranchal as mentioned in section 129 or such owner of any immovable property in Uttaranchal who has acquired it on or before [deleted], or to any member of the ‘family’….”

Furthermore, the newly inserted Section 154(4)(1)(a) provided that a non-tenure holder or a person not owing property before [deleted] may purchase land not exceeding 500 sq. mts. in his lifetime without the permission (of the Government). This limit was reduced to 250 sq. mts. by an amendment dated July 16, 2007. Interestingly, the 2007 amendment also added the words ‘for residential purpose’ after 250 sq. mts. Therefore, the law now reads: ‘250 sq. mts. for residential purpose in his lifetime without the permission.’

These two sections created a lot of hue and cry among investors as it was reported by the media and interpreted by the common man to mean an absolute prohibition on all kinds of property. However, Section 1 (2) of the Amendment Act restricted the application of these new sections effectively only to agricultural land or land outside municipal/cantonment limits. Clause (2) states:

“It extends to the whole State of Uttaranchal except the areas included and may be included from time to time in any Municipal Corporation, Nagar Panchayat, Nagar Parishad and Cantonment Board Limits.”

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
89986 Answers
2493 Consultations

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer