My builder has given possession since 2013 but the flats are still not registered in individual names. During possession the builder collected 3.09% as service tax, however now the builder in the name of MMH Retail Holdings Ltd is asking to settle 1.5%VAT by 30 June as the VAT in the state of Telangana is expected to increase to over 5% from July.
Should the VAT be settled outside flat registration?
The demand for additional VAT is unreasonable especially demanding the same quoting the future event on it.
An under-construction property can be divided into three parts, vis-à-vis its cost components. The first part is the cost of the land and calls for no VAT or service tax. The second part is the cost of material which is liable for VAT. The third part is the cost of construction and involves labour charges and can be treated as a service that is rendered by the developer to the purchaser. Therefore, service tax can be levied on this component.
VAT is levied on the sale of goods (movable properties). For any sale to attract VAT, it should involve a transfer of goods from one person to another. In the case of under-construction properties, it is the transfer of ownership rights from the developer to the buyer in the form of a sale agreement, in select states. This tax is governed by the ‘works contract’ in the VAT law. For instance, VAT is charged at the rate of one per cent of 'agreement value' in Mumbai and Pune and five per cent in Bangalore, but there is no VAT levied on apartments purchased in Noida, Chennai, and Kolkata. For more information on property in Noida,