This appears a complex situation and it continues for four years without a solution. Once I got the heirs certificate. I am thinking to transfer the property on my name and that non-cooperative sister's. So that the we both would become the owners. Is this possible without her acknowledgement ? Is this a reasonable idea ?
If this property was transferred to your father by his sister vide a registered gift or settlement deed, then it becomes your father's absolute and own property.
Now upon his intestate death, the property shall devolve equally among all his legal heirs which include you, your siblings and your mother (if living).
If you want the property to be on your name alone then all other legal heirs have to execute a registered release deed relinquishing their rights in your favor, after which you can mutate the properties in yor name and can also transfer all the revenue and other records to your name.
Since one of your sisters is revolting against the collective decision of other legal heirs, you cannot compel her to accept the decision neither you can apply for mutating the revenue records jointly if she objects.
Under the give circumstances, you may get the registered release deed execute in your favor by all those willing legal heirs/shareholders and after that you can file a partition suit seeking division of properties into number of equal shares to the proportion of the number of legal heirs and separate possession of your legitimate shares, which would include the shares of others transferred in your favor vide a release deed.
Partition suit shall be the last option if the amicable talks fail to fetch any fruit. .