Your issue turns on a clear distinction in law between the builder’s dues and the society’s dues, and this is where most societies face confusion.
From the date of possession (2014) till the date of society formation (2019), the maintenance—unless there is a specific legal transfer or assignment—was payable to the builder/developer, not to the society (which did not legally exist at that time). Therefore, strictly in law, those unpaid amounts are builder’s dues, not automatically recoverable by the society.
Once the society is formed, its powers to recover dues arise under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (assuming your property is in Maharashtra). Under this law, the society can recover its own dues (i.e., maintenance from the date of formation onwards) through statutory mechanisms, including recovery proceedings. However, it cannot ordinarily recover pre-formation dues owed to the builder, unless there is a proper legal basis.
The only situations where the society can recover those earlier dues are:
- If the builder has formally assigned his right to recover maintenance to the society (through an agreement, deed of assignment, or specific clause in conveyance or handover documents); or
- If, at the time of society formation, there is a clear resolution + documented transfer of accounts showing that such arrears were taken over by the society; or
- If the bye-laws or allotment agreements specifically provide that such arrears shall be treated as society dues upon formation.
In the absence of such assignment or transfer, the society cannot legally compel members to pay builder-period arrears into the society account, because the society was not the creditor at that time.
However, you still have practical leverage:
The society can insist that members clear past dues with the builder as a condition for certain administrative approvals, but it cannot enforce recovery through statutory recovery proceedings unless the dues are legally its own.
Regarding conveyance, non-payment of maintenance by some members is often used by builders as a reason to delay conveyance, but legally this is not a valid ground. The society can independently pursue deemed conveyance proceedings against the builder.
In summary, the society can recover maintenance only from the date of its formation as its statutory right. Pre-formation maintenance is recoverable only if there is a valid legal transfer of that claim from the builder to the society. Otherwise, those dues remain between the builder and the defaulting members.
If you want, I can help you examine your society’s documents to check whether such an assignment exists and suggest a stronger recovery strategy.