In 2010, the Supreme Court had ruled that the government cannot be compelled to reconvey the land to the original owner if the same can be utilised for any public purpose other than the one for which it was acquired. In another ruling in 2016, the apex court also said that authorities can return the land to the original owner in case its transfer to a third party leads to profiteering.

“When the land sought to be acquired for a public purpose is allowed to be transferred to private persons, any administrative action or private transaction could be held to be vitiated by fraud. There is no legal sanction for such action,” it added.

In case of land acquired under the 2013 law, land that remains unutilised for five years can be returned to the original owner. Section 101 of the 2013 law says that such land “shall be returned to the original owner or owners or their legal heirs”. The law also allows for enlisting the land into a government-prescribed land bank.

In your case the compensation has not been fully paid neither the interest towards the delayed payment towards land acquired was paid despite many visits to the concerned office.

Hence you may file a writ petition before high court nd seek the reliefs as suggested. 

You can very well claim interest however any claim would be restricted to three years limitation from the date of last transaction or from the date the claim for interested was acknowledged by the government

You cannot reclaim the land by returning compensation amount to KAIDB 

2) merely because land is not used for purpose for which it was acquired is not ground for reclaiming land 

3) In the case Chandragauda Ramgonda Patil & Anr.
vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [(1996) 6 SCC 405],
claim of the petitioner for restitution of the possession of
the land acquired pursuant to the resolution of the State
Government was rejected. In para 2, this Court observed
thus:-
"2........ We do not think that this Court would be
justified in making direction for restitution of the
land to the erstwhile owners when the land was
taken way back and vested in the Municipality
free from all encumbrances. We are not
concerned with the validity of the notification in
either of the writ petitions. It is axiomatic that
the land acquired for a public purpose would be
utilized for any other public purpose, though use
of it was intended for the original public purpose.
It is not intended that any land which remained
should be restituted to the erstwhile
owner to whom adequate compensation was
paid according to the market value as on the
date of the notification. Under these
circumstances, the High Court was well justified
in refusing to grant relief in both the writ
petitions

the compensation was paid to you in 2010 . you should have claimed interest at that time for delay in payment of compensation and not after 14 years 

t

Dear Client,

The land so acquired by the government cannot be reclaimed once the landowners have accepted the compensation and it continues to remain in possession of the land acquisition authority for whatever purpose. However, if the land abates utility and no development has been undertaken or carried out on the acquired land fee, if necessary, you can file a legal case challenging the acquisition on the ground that after such a long lapse of time the purpose mentioned in the order of acquisition was not accomplished. As far as the compensation awarded relates to land, building, trees, wells etc, since you have not been paid for all these, you may approach the court and file a plaint to claim this compensation. During award of compensation, if there is a delay in making payment of the same, interest is payable at the rate of 9 per cent for the first year and 15 per cent p.a. for the subsequent periods which runs from the date the land was taken possession of till the time the compensation is paid. You can claim interest on account of the delayed compensation deposits. Interest cannot be waived and is a statutory entitlement. Payment of tax deducted under the Income-tax Act, 1961 on compensation received in respect of compulsory acquisition of urban agricultural land should be paid to the agriculturalist. There is no requirement of TDS for rural agricultural land. However, supposing the compensation is received, in such cases also, TDS is deducted as per the provisions of the Act.