1. The court will not accept his word as the gospel truth, but the documentary evidence is not easy to rebut.

2. You executed an agreement with him which was notarized. It did not require a mandatory registration under the law. On the basis of the notarized agreement he may file a lawsuit against you to recover the principal amount along with compensation from you. If and when he does this the court will give you a fair opportunity to contest his case in defence.

3. If you fail to honour the court order then it will inevitably send you to civil prison.

Do not buckle under pressure. Immediately lodge complaint of your forceful signature on the cheque.

The creditor can not prove the lending of 50 lakh rupees and hence the cheque bouncing case will not survive in court.

1. The property of your parents cannot be attached and sold as the liability created by you is a personal liability which cannot be extended to your parents.

2. If you signed the cheque under duress then issue stop payment instructions to your bank immediately.

1. Yes, lodge complaint on loss of cheque or forceful signature on cheque.

2. If he publishes the matter in newspaper you can file defamation case against him.

3. I think you should file case of criminal intimidation against the man than lodging complaint of loss of cheque.

If you admit that you took rs. 25 lakhs by case, the court can easily draw the opinion that you would have taken rs. 50 lakhs too based on the loan agreement in the bond paper. The contents that you agree to pay 5% p.m. may be a hitch because this is an exorbitant interest and banned by the government by enacting a prohibitory act in this regard. Therefore yo should deny the entire amount and should say that this was taken blank fr the purpose of security earlier when you borrowed and repaid the small amount of loan. Yo do not have to worry about the evidences for repayment, but can mention in your reply notice or the written statement i th recovery suit. Yo can maintain that his was for security purpose only and can also insist on his ITR for is capacity to lend the huge loan. let him come to the court, yo can properly challenge the case.