• Tenants agreement with developer for Alternative Permanent Accom

Ours is a fifty year old tenanted premise within the Muncipal Corporation limits . There are only six tenants in the building. 
The building has been declared dilapidated C1 category by the municipality. The landlord has executed a development agreement with the developer and has authorised the developer to directly deal with the tenants and execute the agreement with the tenants. The tenants have given a NOC to get the plans approved for redevelopment. However due to certain issues with respect to subdivision of the plot, the plans are not yet approved. 
The builder is insisting that the tenants agree to the demolition of the building so that the dispute for subdivision will be sorted and then he will execute the agreement with the tenants for Permanent Alternative Accommodation. He is insisting that the tenants need not worry as the municipality will not grant Commencement Certificate unless the tenants agreement is registered. 

We have insisted that the developer sign the agreement with the proposed plan and register the agreement before we consent for the demolition. However the developer insists that this would not be possible as we are not the owners of the land. 
In the above situation I would like to know whether:-
1.	The tenants can register the agreement with the developer even if the plan is not sanctioned on the basis of proposed plan and then sign a supplementary agreement after the plan is sanctioned for allotment of permanent alternate accommodation in lieu of our tenancy rights.
2.	What is the risk to the tenants if tenants consent to demolishing the building before registering agreement with the developer. Does is adversely affects our Tenancy Rights. What is the recourse if he constructs the building and sells all the accommodation without registering our agreement
3.	Can we write to the Municipal Commissioner that the Commencement certificate should not be granted unless the agreement with the tenants has been registered and submitted to the Municipality? Will it be binding on the municipality to adhere to our request and what is the recourse if the CC is given without our agreements being registered with the developer.
4.	Your suggestion to safeguard the tenants interest which will be legally valid in such a situation. What kind of document to be executed and registered so cthat the tenants interest are protected.
Asked 6 years ago in Property Law
Religion: Hindu

First answer received in 30 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

2 Answers

I have already advised you telephonically

2) you can register the agreement with developer even if plan is not sanctioned . Can enter into supplementary agreement after plan is sanctioned

3) if you vacate the premises before demolition of building there is no guarantee that builder will on construction of building deliver you possession of the flat

You can go to court but if you have registered agreement it protects your rights

You can write to MC that CC should not be issued before registration of agreement with tenants but it would not be binding upon MC

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94514 Answers
7484 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

1. You may take the help of an advocate to draft the agreement carefully. Since the occupants are betting their asset (the current structure would be demolished), it is important the builder compensates them well, abides by the law, and fulfils the demands stated in the agreement. Therefore, the agreement should be comprehensive to ensure the occupants don't suffer financial losses in case the builder fails to complete the project.

The agreement with the developer can be registered for Permanent Alternative Accommodation for protecting the tenancy rights.

2. Under such a situation the registered agreement will be of immense help to sue the developer accordingly, or the the developer should give a security deposit to the members; this should be equal to the construction cost of rebuilding the society, according to the new design. As a precautionary step, the developer is expected to give a bank guarantee of at least 20 per cent of the project cost. The money would be used in case the developer fails to complete the project on time.

3. The Municipality may not entertain any such letter or request.

The members have to ensure the developer purchases the additional TDR (transfer of development rights) and loads it on the members.. "Members should ensure this before vacating their house because if the TDR rules change after vacating, the builder might not be able to give the extra flat area he had promised,

Members should be given an alternate accommodation, preferably in the same area. Or, the developer should agree to pay the person's monthly rent. Builders should provide advance payments for a year to members for rents (in the new accommodation). Whereas, for the next year, they should provide post-dated cheques.

4. The members should agree to vacate their homes only after the builder has secured the necessary legal approvals and permits (city-specific or eg: approvals from Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation) to redevelop that space. It is important that the rights of an original occupant remain unchanged after the new building comes up.

"Don't vacate the house until the agreement is registered and it says exactly what the members had demanded.

Members shouldn't vacate the flat unless the developer issues an intimation of disapproval with the sanctioned plans and loads the TDR on themembers. Also, ensure the security deposit and the bank guarantee are paid.

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
84709 Answers
2172 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer