Ab initio rescission/ repudiation of L& L agreement of 11 months notarized but not registered in Go

There exists a housing society in Goa,Suit Flat is located & occupants get share certificate but no strict title documents are insisted.One L & L of 11months is executed for 11 months but it shows possession one day before date of execution before public notary,after around 8 months the licencee sends letter of repudiation/ rescission for playing fraud/ undue influence etc...nand says whatever payment done so far is under protest n does it till 11th month.The licensor in the meanwhile sends ambiguous reply to repudiation/ rescission notice but doesn't object to its validity & states will not b extending the License n for overstating 500 per day will be charged but not clear if it will be addition to the license fee 11000 pm.After 11months sends Notice but only one typed page stapled to a blank page is received, the type page at the end of the last sentence has the advocate signature. Licencee does not find in that page the word Eviction or Notice to Quit he ignores it.Then injunction ( mandatory) suit is filed. The Defendant on first date asks for title documents from Licensor,court says premature as WS not filed,also same day files for maintaining Status Quo u/s 94 cpc,for which WS is not mandatory, court seeks reply..till date since 2019 it is pending. Next date plaintiff filed for striking defense if arrears of licencee fee not deposited in court.The Defendant WS gets time barred for some genuine difficulty , files with condonation of delay applications,n subsequent dates files reply to applications for payment of arrears,but next date he comes to know as Goa Cooperative Society Act the eviction related matter is barred in Civil Court so files for Rejection of Plaint as matter to be heard by Ld Coperative Authority. The Plaintff immediately develops cold feet after multiple opportunities files reply saying there is no housing society, but the bailiffs report in case file says he delivered summon to Defendant after office of housing society pointed out the Suit Flat ! Defendant subsequently gets proof of existence of housing society n filed 340 CrPC application..the Plaintiffs opportunity to file reply gets closed..not replied till date..Subsequently the Plaintiff inspite of application to maintain status quo pending adjudication ,without leave of the court goes to electricity department n gets his name in the bill included, although another person name was mentioned and an original copy was filed by Defendant on first date of hearing with Application to bring title documents. From electricity department records it is revealed that during the 11 months period an affidavit of plaintiff with his mother was filed saying they in possession of the Suit Flat n there is no mention of licencee/ tenant.Defendant moves Application that his WS not yet taken on record be returned to him along with reply to Application for Arrears due to suppression of facts post discovery of new documents in electricity department that are in conflict with the Pla