Pending Vigilance Clearnce

Respected Sir, I would like to bring a few points on which no action has been taken so far, even after a period of 4 years, which have increased my sufferings manifold on account of non-issuance of vigilance clearance. 2. A false and fabricated case u/s 498-A of the IPC was filed against the undersigned who surrendered in the Hajipur Court on 15.7.2013. Subsequently, the undersigned was kept on deemed suspension. On 25.4.2014, a Review Committee constituted by Ministry of I&B recommended the revocation of suspension of the undersigned by giving the reason that detention was unjustified. On 9.6.2014, undersigned joined as regular Personal Assistant under Seniority Quota in Department of Expenditure along with Vigilance Clearance. 3. Apart from suffering on home front, I am also suffering on official front due to non-responsive attitude of the concerned authority. The details are as under :- a) It is known that I have been promoted as PS on adhoc basis under Seniority Quota for which vigilance clearance is required. b) MACP is due since 8.7.2017 has not been granted to the undersigned. c) Other things are also being denied to me like forwarding of my application for deputation and/or result of Departmental examination of 2014 etc. d) Keeping in view the above facts and reply received from ADJ-II, Vaishali, Hajipur dated 16.11.2017 that charges are yet to be framed, withholding of vigilance clearance by the Department has affected my career badly and has caused severe mental agony. e) Till Date, material facts in this case have not changed since I was relieved from the Ministry of XXX and joined the YY Department along with Vigilance Clearance and no charges have been framed against the undersigned in the dowry case. 4. I have made several representations in the past through proper channel but nothing could be heard yet. As a result my grievances still remained unheeded. 5. Further, procedure laid down by Supreme Court in K.V. Jankiraman case, withholding of vigilance clearance to a Government servant who is not under suspension or who has not been issued a charge sheet and the disciplinary proceedings are pending or against whom prosecution for criminal charge is not pending may not be legally tenable in view of the procedure laid down in the O.M. 6. Keeping in view the facts stated above I would like to request you to kindlyadvise me to get the due service benefits at the earliest. With Regards, [M K Singh]