• Compensation for land acquisition

A piece of land has been acquired by puducherry goverment for the formation of bye pass road under 4(1) notification under section 17 of the land acquisition act 1894.The land was taken over on 30.10.2013 and 80% compensation was paid on 20.04.2014. The award is yet to be passed till date.I have filed a WP in Madras high court seeking direction to Pass the award under section 24 (1) of the new act 2013 since the award is It passed. On 20.12.2014 Madras high court has ordered to pass the award under new act and pay the amount after deducting the 80‰ that has been already paid.

The puducherry goverment formed rules notifying that 


34. Determination of market value for lands acquired under the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.— (i) The reference date for calculation of
market value under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 24 shall be
1-1-2014 the date of (commencement of Right to Fair Compensation and
Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement
Act, 2013)

(ii) The reference date for calculating additional market value
under sub-section (3) of section 30 of the Act for land acquisition
proceedings initiated under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 shall be the date
of preliminary notification i.e., the date of notification under
sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition 


Later by another notification the puducherry goverment has amended the section 34 as

Land Acquisition Act, 1894.— (i) The reference date for calculation of
market value under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 24 shall be the date
of preliminary notification i.e., the date of notification under
sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Land Acquisition 

 
Thus taking the market value and the 12% additional market value as on date of 4(1) notification.

In my case :
Last date of 4(1) notification under section 17: 01.02.2011

Date at which possession of land is taken over:30.10.2013(1003 days from the date of notification).


The collector has proposed to calculate the compensation as follows:


Land value as on 01.02.2011 and add 

Solatium 100% (previously it was calculated at 30%)and calculate 12% additional market value from 01.02.2011 to 30.10.2013 for 1003 days (the date of takeover of the land) and deduct the 80% amount already given and for the balance amount pay an intrest of 9% for one year and 15% after one year till the date of ward.


The section 34 of the rule framed by the puducherry government itself is wrong since as per section 24 of the new 2013 act if no award is passed then compensation has to be calculated as on 01.01.2014.
 
Kindly advice me whether section 34 of the puducherry land acquisition rule can be challenged.

Whether the proposed calculation by the collector is correct or wrong. If wrong what is the correct method as per law.
Asked 5 years ago in Civil Law

First answer received in 10 minutes.

Lawyers are available now to answer your questions.

10 Answers

You can file wiring petition in HC against validity of Rule  34 framed by Pondicherry govt as HC has directed collector to calculate compensation as per new act 

 

2) further as per new act if no award is passed then compensation has to be calculated as on January 2014 

 

3)Under section 24 of new land acquistion act 2013 provides that if award has not been passed then provisions of new land acquistion act shall apply regarding payment of compensation

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94720 Answers
7532 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Any provision enacted by state govt. in violation of central act is void. Amendment is void , challenge the same before HC. 

 

Yogendra Singh Rajawat
Advocate, Jaipur
22636 Answers
31 Consultations

4.4 on 5.0

It's a illegal and wrong.  File writ petition before high court

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
31951 Answers
179 Consultations

4.1 on 5.0

Details require for precise rulling 

Yogendra Singh Rajawat
Advocate, Jaipur
22636 Answers
31 Consultations

4.4 on 5.0

The Supreme Court in the case of Aligarh Development Authority v. Megh Singh & ors[elucidated on the law relating to lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

The Apex Court stated that Section 24 of the 2013 Act envisages mainly two situations:

  • Where the     land       acquisition     proceedings         had already    been     initiated      under       the     1894   Act    but   no    award   was passed till the date the new Act came into force;
  • Where the Award has     been      passed       but        neither    the    owner      has     been dispossessed nor has he been paid the compensation;

Under the first situation, where the award had not been passed, the acquisition proceedings could continue, but the compensation will have to be determined under the scheme of 2013 Act.

Under the second situation, there is a statutory lapse of the proceedings

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94720 Answers
7532 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

The calculation of award for compensation by the collector or the government may be according to the present policy and rules.

If aggrieved by the compensation which is not ion accordance with the latest rules, and if you are aggrieved by the decision then you may once again approach high court for relief by filing a writ petition.

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
84921 Answers
2195 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

The high court judgment itself is sufficient for this, you may quote your own case judgment and insist the authorities to implement the court order properly.

 

T Kalaiselvan
Advocate, Vellore
84921 Answers
2195 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Yes the amendment by Puducherry govt is wrong you should challenge the amendment by writ petition in high court.

Mohit Kapoor
Advocate, Rohtak
10687 Answers
7 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

You can accept award under protest and make application for reference to collector against compensation amount 

Ajay Sethi
Advocate, Mumbai
94720 Answers
7532 Consultations

5.0 on 5.0

Yes you can  do that. you can do under protest and then challenge in high court

 

Prashant Nayak
Advocate, Mumbai
31951 Answers
179 Consultations

4.1 on 5.0

Ask a Lawyer

Get legal answers from lawyers in 1 hour. It's quick, easy, and anonymous!
  Ask a lawyer