FIR quash on compromise u/s 482 HC
A FIR was registered U/S 420 , 467, 468, 471, 120 B against 15 persons. Now complainant has compromised the matter with 5 persons but not with rest of the persons.
Today petition under 482 was filed in HC for quashing FIR on the basis of compromise.
Now i have few questions to ask.
1. All the accused have been named as respondents alongwith complainant with 1 accused which is a company being the petitioner.
So does this states that this is compromise with all accused ? Because if this was a partial compromise why would the accused with whom compromise is not made be made respondents ? Am i correct in my logic?
2. Its written in the petition that all the accused are arrayed as party in the present petition. It is also written that none of the accused is Proclaimed Offender.
Does this line means that this is full compromise and the complainant can't now speak against the accused with whom he had not yet compromised ? Or does this line states that compromise is done with all the accused ?
Please help me friends. This is really important for me.
Asked 3 years ago in Criminal Law from Delhi, Delhi